Each demonstration follows one problem along the food system: stage → practice → what was measured → did it work? → was the endpoint reached? → how far the evidence reached → primary source.
- “Did it work?” and “endpoint reached?” are different questions — a practice can do the first without the second.
- Evidence reach is the furthest outcome the evidence actually established, not a score: the positions are named endpoints, not points on a 0–100 scale.
- Depth is not quality. Reaching a further endpoint means the evidence travelled further, not that the study was stronger than one with a rigorously measured nearer endpoint.
- “Not determined” means no conclusion could be drawn from the available evidence — not that nothing happened.
- Position on the chain is not a ranking. Upstream controls usually have more leverage on the problem, but a downstream check can be the decisive step that keeps unsafe food off the plate.